Getting Over Ovi

Image from Wikipedia

In a press release yesterday, Nokia informed its customers that its Ovi services would be folded back into the Nokia brand.  Is this simply an admission of brand evangelism failure, or the prelude to further, more significant business changes?

Ovi History

Publicly launched as a brand in late 2007, Ovi was intended to be a comprehensive collection of web and device services/applications with an emphasis on mobility.  Nokia at the time began referring to itself as an “Internet company” although some, including employees such as myself, were never clear on just what that meant.

Perhaps Nokia executives weren’t, either.  Ovi services have been in perpetual beta and never seemed to enjoy the level of support the solution set needed in order to compete.  But who was Ovi competing against?  In some ways, Google, Microsoft, Yahoo and even cell phone service carriers.  The chimeric Ovi struggled to find acceptance as a unified brand because too many customers and partners only wanted certain pieces of it, unwilling to give up their own equivalent offerings.

Crack in the Door

First to fall in the Ovi stable was Ovi Files, the web-hosted file replication part.  This is certainly a compelling service for mobile and desktop customers, and cloud-based solutions are steadily gaining traction (despite the occasional major outage) so it wasn’t as if Nokia erred in putting it out there.  But monetizing consumer web storage has been tricky, at least partly due to figuring out a reasonable subscription fee.  After its acquisition from Avvenu, the Ovi Files service went from a paid premium to free model, perhaps to position Files as a loss-leader to draw customers in to other premium services.  Why was it discontinued?  Shane McLaughlin of Nokia stated that Files was at some point evaluated as not fitting in with their evolving business model.  Given that they also offer dedicated media storage solutions, this can be understood.

There have been various misfires, delays and other frustrations involving every piece of Ovi, but none likely more aggravating to users than the Nokia-to-Yahoo Ovi mail migration.  Some disruption was to be expected, and Nokia did a great job keeping customers notified of the impending change and then its progress.  I had no problem with being unable to access legacy Inbox contents and was well-prepared for it.  What I wasn’t ready for was that email would be completely inaccessible via the web client for two weeks.  Let me clarify: emails would load, but I could do nothing with them– not even read.  When that was finally resolved, I received another rude awakening: full IMAP support was removed once the mail service moved to Yahoo.  This meant going to POP, which typically cleans emails off of the server once they are downloaded to a local reader.  POP doesn’t cut it for mobile email; users need to feel confident that they can access the same content via smartphone, laptop, desktop or what-have-you.  It doesn’t help that Ovi site documentation is out of date.  On a positive note, the web client has been behaving the past few days as if full IMAP is there again, but I need to confirm.

Another plus is that Ovi Maps has been, for the most part, a stellar success.  Even as other parts of Ovi struggled and stumbled to escape the beta black hole, Maps consistently added feature after feature.  True, the N900 implementation came up short, contrary to some puzzling, glowing reviews– but I’m focusing on the main line.

Name or Game Change?

Now Nokia shifts gears once again, rebranding Ovi services with the Nokia name.  This seems to be a concession that “Ovi by Nokia” failed to resonate as a sub-brand.  One can argue the value of pulling service branding closer to the core, but sub-branding has been either an outright success or a non-issue at least for many other consumer brands.  Consider for example US-based General Motors, which for decades had no problem managing several sub-brands under its umbrella.  But perhaps this is easier to pull off for hard goods than for services… especially if the owning brand seeks to sell those services beyond its own borders.

To make matters more interesting, technology gadfly Eldar Murtazin is at his rumor-pushing best again, this time claiming that the recent Microsoft-Nokia partnership is a first step to something more astounding.  With the signature ink still wet on the device-contracting agreement, the two companies are supposedly negotiating the sale of Nokia’s handset business, in whole or part.

Such a move could conceivably pare Nokia down to little more than a service, or Internet, company after all.  Thus, more closely identifying services with the company name would make sense, especially to trade customers.  Would, say, T-Mobile really want to put out something like “the T-Mobile Model XXX phone with Ovi by Nokia”?  Too much for consumers to chew on.  Cropping off “Ovi” tidies things up immediately.

IF Eldar is correct on this one, the move would be profound.  In essence, it would signal a monumental sea change for both companies, each shifting dramatically from one core business toward its polar opposite.  Microsoft would be extending its Xbox and peripheral businesses to become more of a hardware company, while Nokia could become a more virtual version of itself.  Nothing new in Nokia’s case, but for Microsoft it would be another acknowledgement that its desktop consumer and business software segments are falling victim to consumer mobilization.

Door Half Open or Half Closed?

I tried as both a Nokia employee and later as pure consumer to support and offer feedback on Ovi services.  I was a hardcore user of Ovi Mail especially but the Yahoo debacle left a sour taste in my mouth.  I’m in the process presently of migrating over to a new email address associated with my skimpy vanity site.

I still want to see the original idea succeed, but I’m thinking more and more that it will do so in a very different way than first presented.  Will that be due to another revolutionary business change at Nokia, or something more evolutionary?  And how will the changes enabled by HTML5 play into Nokia’s web service plans?  Right now all anyone outside Nokia House can do is speculate, but I guess we’ll know something by the end of this year.  Stay tuned!


11 responses to “Getting Over Ovi

  1. I think that Ovi to Nokia change is rather consequence of resent changes than prelude to something.

    Ovi was created in moment when Nokia was opening Symbian and hoping that it will be widely adopted by other producers. With that in mind Nokia was backing into shadows to allow – relatively painlessly from marketing pov – use of Nokia services by companies like Sharp, Fujitsu, etc. In the same spirit Google is hidden on Android pages.

    In some sense it is really contrary to recent rumors about sale of handset div to MS. If this was the ultimate goal it would be easier to directly use MS brands to avoid costs of double-rebranding. Of course costs would matter if at the helm are persons who care about longterm prosperity of Nokia. About which I am doubtful…

  2. I’d say this was a brand change only. But if taking the view you have, looking at an overall picture, yes, Nokia is disrupting itself again. I tweeted this, but will say again, OPK made a passing mention once saying something to the effect of “what if Nokia no longer made mobiles; what if it sold off the hardware side?” Ovi always felt like they were saying that to me. Maybe, just maybe, these are indeed the wheels in motion. And then Nokia would exist as a service, which in todays economies, seems the only products that matter.

  3. Victor Szulc

    People often forget that there’s more to Nokia than Nokia the cellphone company. They used to make rubber boots and paper, before getting into cellphones and TVs, then sold those businesses off to concentrate on cellphones and networks.

    So it’s far from unlikely that the board of Nokia might sell off the some , or all of its handset business, leaving Nokia the corporation with a mountain of cash, and the room to concentrate on a new business. (Whether that is concentrating on dumbphones, electronic services or something entirely else.)

    Think about it… The board is starting to realize, just how abominable Nokias execution has been the last couple of years, and how far behind the competition they really are. Moving to WP7 might save their mobile business, or it might not. So right now, while Microsoft believes they still have a fighting chance in the mobile space, and is willing to pay a premium is the perfect time to sell it off. In two years it will probably be too late.

    • You raise an interesting point about the cash. Now combine that with Nokia releasing thousands of employees who may not be seen as aligned with some secret, future change. I understand the mindset of those preferring not to speculate so wildly, but I really would not be surprised to see a completely different Nokia next year. I actually predicted such a thing in 2007 and was surprised at subsequent reorganizations that really didn’t move the company forward…

  4. It was evident that after the Feb11th announcement, the brand “Ovi” had no place. Irrespective of whether this is part of a bigger acquisition plan or not, Microsoft would never want to be associated with the “Ovi” brand directly or indirectly. With one Ovi debacle after another, I don’t find this surprising.

  5. destroyedchocolate

    As someone else meantioned earlier you do forget the nokia is more than just a phone company and that they did try to provide a market like iPhone and Android. It’s a shame that the Ovi market is not going to be as prominant in the world as the others however if they changed their tactics perhaps there is hope for them yet? Is there a competition between Nokia and the more increasingly popular phones such as iPhone and Android that are causing Ovi to be less noticeable?

    Very interesting blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s